Glass House Brands Inc.
Is there value inside this enterprise that the company is not currently capturing?
Filings through Dec 31, 2025 · Market data as of Sep 16, 2026
WE MODEL THE ENTERPRISE.™
01Executive summary
Glass House Brands Inc. enters the engine with $23.4M of cash against $657.9M of market value. Token Clear detected 3 value pathways from the company's own filings, led by Structured Refinancing of High-Cost Debt, Employee Ownership & Retention Program and Reserve Diversification Policy (Digital Assets).
- GAAP EBITDA margin compressed from 10.0% (prior fiscal year) to -0.8% trailing — about $19.7M of annual EBITDA at today's revenue.
- Revenue grew -9.4% in the latest fiscal year.
- Latest machine-readable financials end 2025-12-31. Interim results filed on non-XBRL forms (e.g. 6-K) are not ingested — treat current-quarter figures as DATA REQUIRED.
- EBITDA is negative — EBITDA-multiple valuation is not meaningful.
02Current enterprise state
| Fact | Value | Class | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & short-term investments | $23.4M | REPORTED | Dec 31, 2025 | 40-F · filed 2026-03-24 |
| Operating cash flow (TTM) | $11.4M | REPORTED | Dec 31, 2025 | 40-F · filed 2026-03-24 |
| Cash runway | — | DATA REQUIRED | Dec 31, 2025 | Cash & ST investments ÷ annual operating cash burn |
| Total assets | $318.6M | REPORTED | Dec 31, 2025 | 40-F · filed 2026-03-24 |
| Non-current assets | — | DATA REQUIRED | — | — |
| Exploration & mineral assets | — | DATA REQUIRED | — | — |
| Total liabilities | $144.0M | REPORTED | Dec 31, 2025 | 40-F · filed 2026-03-24 |
| Total debt | $68.7M | REPORTED | Dec 31, 2025 | 40-F · filed 2026-03-24 |
| Shareholders' equity | $73.9M | REPORTED | Dec 31, 2025 | 40-F · filed 2026-03-24 |
| Shares outstanding | 81.9M | CALCULATED | Dec 31, 2025 | 40-F · filed 2026-03-24 |
| Share price | $8.03 | REPORTED | Sep 16, 2026 | Yahoo Finance · NYSE |
| Market capitalization | $657.9M | CALCULATED | Sep 16, 2026 | Share price × shares outstanding |
| Price / Book | 8.9× | CALCULATED | Sep 16, 2026 | Market cap ÷ shareholders' equity |
03Evidence quality
04Value pathways
Ranked by deterministic Token Clear score. Each pathway lists the evidence that triggered it, the assumptions that size it, and what stands in its way.
Implied cost of debt is 10.3% on $68.7M of borrowings. Revenue-participation, convertible or asset-backed structures (including RPCST™-style instruments where permitted) are modeled to lower the all-in cost of capital.
Stock-based compensation is $13.4M a year (7.4% of revenue). Participation structures that align employees with measured enterprise outcomes can deliver the same retention with less dilution.
A board-approved policy could allocate 0.5%–2.0% of the $5.2M excess liquidity to digital-asset reserves tied to a defined strategic purpose. Returns are price-dependent and are not modeled.
05Financial scenarios
Asset-based methodology: counted pathways retain — of per-share value by replacing dilutive equity. Use the Financial Lab to model holdings and project values against book.
Scenario columns apply the low, midpoint and high end of every counted pathway range. The peer column isolates a market re-rating and is shown for sensitivity only.
06Multiple Intelligence™
| Driver | Glass House Brands Inc. | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | -9.4% | — | data required |
| EBITDA margin | -0.8% | — | data required |
| FCF conversion | — | — | data required |
| Return on invested capital | -11.0% | — | data required |
| Net leverage | — | — | data required |
| Capex intensity | 14.9% | — | data required |
| Stock comp / revenue | 7.4% | — | data required |
Peer set (0 valid of 0): none configured.
07The 1% Thesis™ — validated bottom-up
08Recommended sequence & 90-day proof of value
- • Structured Refinancing of High-Cost Debt
- • Employee Ownership & Retention Program
- • Reserve Diversification Policy (Digital Assets)
| Days 1–15 | Validate | Confirm reported facts, peer set and every ASSUMPTION with Glass House Brands Inc. finance leadership; close DATA REQUIRED gaps from primary filings. |
| Days 16–45 | Design | Detailed design for NOW pathways: Structured Refinancing of High-Cost Debt. Counsel review of regulatory blockers. |
| Days 46–75 | Approve & activate | Human approval gate per pathway; activate approved pathways with defined owners and baselines. |
| Days 76–90 | Measure | Baseline vs. target vs. actual on the first measurable metrics; decide on NEXT pathways and a platform engagement. |
09Risks & dependencies
- Securities-law, lender consent and rating-agency review.
- Accounting, custody and board risk-appetite approval required.
10Methodology & disclosures
Evidence classes. REPORTED taken from SEC XBRL filings or delayed market data · CALCULATED deterministic derivation with formula · BENCHMARK live peer comparable · ASSUMPTION explicit, challengeable input · SCENARIO output of stated assumptions.
Calculations. Trailing-twelve-month figures are fiscal year + current year-to-date − prior year-to-date. EBITDA is operating income plus depreciation and amortization (GAAP-derived, excluding non-GAAP adjustments). Enterprise value is market capitalization plus total debt less cash and short-term investments, excluding leases, minority interest and preferred equity. Non-USD filers are converted at spot. Recurring pathway economics are valued at today's multiple; overlapping pathways are counted once and contingent pathways are excluded.
Governance. AI does not perform or override valuation arithmetic. Scoring configuration is confidential and server-side. No pathway proceeds without human approval.
Disclosure. This study provides enterprise-value intelligence, scenario modeling and strategic analysis. Illustrative scenarios are not forecasts, guarantees, investment recommendations or assurances of market valuation. Market prices and valuation multiples are determined by investors and market conditions. Certain strategies require legal, tax, accounting, regulatory and other professional review before implementation.